Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mol Genet Metab ; 141(1): 108114, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142628

RESUMO

Phenylketonuria is characterized by intellectual disability and behavioral, psychiatric, and movement disorders resulting from phenylalanine (Phe) accumulation. Standard-of-care treatment involves a Phe-restricted diet plus medical nutrition therapy (MNT), with or without sapropterin dihydrochloride, to reduce blood Phe levels. Pegvaliase is an injectable enzyme substitution treatment approved for adult patients with blood Phe >600 µmol/L despite ongoing management. A previous comparative effectiveness analysis using data from the Phase 3 PRISM trials of pegvaliase (NCT01819727 and NCT01889862) and the Phenylketonuria Demographics, Outcomes and Safety Registry (PKUDOS; NCT00778206) suggested that pegvaliase was more effective at lowering mean blood Phe levels than sapropterin + MNT or MNT alone at 1 and 2 years of treatment. The current work augments and complements the previous analysis by including additional follow-up from the completed studies, robust methods reflecting careful consideration of issues with the distribution of Phe, and alternative methods for adjustment that are important for control of potential confounding in comparative effectiveness. Median blood Phe levels were lower, and median intact protein intakes were higher, in the pegvaliase group (n = 183) than in the sapropterin + MNT (n = 82) and MNT (n = 67) groups at Years 1, 2, and 3. In the pegvaliase group, median blood Phe levels decreased from baseline (1244 µmol/L) to Year 1 (535 µmol/L), Year 2 (142 µmol/L), and Year 3 (167 µmol/L). In the sapropterin + MNT group, median blood Phe levels decreased from baseline (900 µmol/L) to Year 1 (588 µmol/L) and Year 2 (592 µmol/L), and increased at Year 3 (660 µmol/L). In the MNT group, median blood Phe levels decreased slightly from baseline (984 µmol/L) to Year 1 (939 µmol/L) and Year 2 (941 µmol/L), and exceeded baseline levels at Year 3 (1157 µmol/L). The model-estimated proportions of participants achieving blood Phe ≤600 µmol/L were 41%, 100%, and 100% in the pegvaliase group at Years 1, 2, and 3, respectively, compared with 55%, 58%, and 38% in the sapropterin + MNT group and 5%, 16%, and 0% in the MNT group. The estimated proportions of participants achieving more stringent blood Phe targets of ≤360 µmol/L and ≤120 µmol/L were also higher in the pegvaliase group than in the other groups at Years 2 and 3. Overall, our results indicate that, compared with standard therapy, pegvaliase induces a substantial, progressive, and sustained decrease in blood Phe levels - to a much greater extent than sapropterin + MNT or MNT alone - which is expected to improve long-term outcomes in patients with phenylketonuria.


Assuntos
Biopterina/análogos & derivados , Terapia Nutricional , Fenilcetonúrias , Adulto , Humanos , Fenilcetonúrias/terapia , Fenilalanina Amônia-Liase , Fenilalanina , Proteínas Recombinantes
2.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 13: 21, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26664289

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: All international guidelines suggested that Tenofovir and Entecavir are the primary drugs at the first line therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, in Turkey these medications reimbursed at the second line therapy according to the Healthcare Implementation Notification. The aim of this study is to compare the cost effectiveness of oral antiviral treatment strategies in CHB for Turkey using lamuvidine, telbuvidine, entecavir, and tenofovir as medications. METHODS: The analysis was conducted using Markov models. The analysis scenarios based on first line treatment options with Lamuvidine, Telbuvidine, Entecavir, and Tenofovir as the medications. In the analysis, inadequate response or resistance after receiving 12 months of the treatment with Entecavir and Telbivudine were compared to the results found from switching from Entecavir to Tenofovir or from switching from Telbuvidine to Tenofovir. In additional, inadequate response or resistance after receiving 6 months of the treatment for Lamivudine was compared to the results found from switching from Lamivudine to Tenofovir. The study population included men and women, who were 40 years of age. The patients` compliance was estimated 100 % for all of the therapy options. The model duration was constructed to evaluate, treatment strategy duration of 40 years. The cost of medications, examinations/follow-ups and complications were included in the model. Years of Potential Life Lost was used as the health outcome. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio analysis has been conducted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: While the minimum years of life lost was found as 0.22 with tenofovir treatment in 5 years, treatment cost was calculated as 12,169 TL. These values were detected as 0.56 years and 7727 TL, 0.37 years and 12,770 TL, respectively for lamuvidine and telbuvidine treatments. The maximum years of life lost and treatment cost was with lamuvidine treatment were detected as 1.60 years and 18,813 TL and, secondly 0.89 years and 24,007 TL for lamuvidine-tenofovir treatment during 10 years. The minimum years of life lost and cost are 0.54 year and 35,821 TL for tenofovir treatment during 10 years. The minimum years of life lost and cost were determined as 1.21 years and 52,839 TL for tenofovir treatment strategy during 20 years. During 30 years period, tenofovir treatment was found to have the minimum years of life lost (1.73 years) and minimum cost (84,149 TL). When the results of 40 years period were analyzed, years of life lost and costs are 2.06 years and 119,604 TL, 2.13 years and 162,115 TL, 2.13 years and 161,642 TL, 6.52 years and 147,245 TL, 3.20 years and 132,157 TL, 4.10 years and 151,059 TL and 3.05 years and 138,182 TL for tenofovir, entecavir, entecavir-tenofovir, lamuvidine, lamuvidine-tenofovir, telbivudine and telbivudine-tenofovir. CONCLUSIONS: In the model presented in this study, in cost effectiveness analysis about CHB treatments, Tenofovir was found to be one of the cost effective methods in comparison with other treatment strategies different time intervals. Beyond this achievement Tenofovir has shown to reduce cumulative treatment cost in first line CHB treatment when compared with regard to 40 year cumulative treatment cost.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...